HOW LINKEDIN AND THE TECH CARTEL CENSORS USERS THAT EXPOSE CRIMES BY LINKEDIN'S VC'S AND EXECUTIVES

Share SHARE WITH EVERYONE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

LINKEDIN CENSORS AND DELETES ACCOUNTS THAT SAY THINGS THAT LINKEDIN'S SEX TRAFFICKING, BRIBE PAYING, TAX EVADING OWNERS DON'T WANT DISCUSSED. FAT REID HOFFMAN, AND HIS BUDDIES AT LINKEDIN, DO SOME VERY BAD THINGS WHEN THEY THINK NOBODY IS LOOKING.

Censorship on LinkedIn Based on Political Views
HOW DOES LINKEDIN GET A PASS ON CRIMES BY THEIR VC'S AND EXECUTIVES? BECAUSE LINKEDIN CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE, THE INFORMATION AND THE IDEOLOGY
 
LINKEDIN, AMAZON, REDDIT, FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, YOUTUBE, NETFLIX AND OTHER PALO ALTO VC FUNDED MEDIA COMPANIES HAVE AGREED TOGETHER TO CENSOR INFORMATION AND DELETE ACCOUNTS THAT DO NOT FOLLOW THE IDEOLOGY THAT THEY ARE PUSHING.

These companies are widely reported to be either CIA, Mossad or related spooky spy operations operating under the guise of consumer "social media". Whatever they are, they lie, manipulate and mass-abuse the public just like stinky spy operations might do!
 
THEY DO THIS BECAUSE THE PALO ALTO VENTURE CAPITALISTS ARE ALL PART OF THE SAME CARTEL OF SOCIOPATH FRAT BOYS WITH A TWISTED CONCEPT OF GLOBAL CONTROL! DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO BANKRUPT THEIR COMPANIES IN SUPPORT OF YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS. THE "ANGELGATE SCANDAL", "NO POACHING LAWSUITS" AND MASSIVE NUMBERS OF OTHER COURT RECORDS PROVE THAT A COLLUSION CARTEL OPERATES BETWEEN SILICON VALLEY MEDIA BOSSES!
 
LINKEDIN DELETES OUR FRIENDS ACCOUNTS BECAUSE THEY POSTED NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT SEX TRAFFICKING AND BRIBERY BY LINKEDIN BOSSES!

DOWNLOAD AND SHARE THE ARTICLE >>>>>  http://londonworldwide.com/public/LINKEDIN_CENSORS_IDEAS_POLITICS_AND_TRUTH.pdf

Censorship on LinkedIn Based on Political Views
Almost every Silicon Valley social media company that has received funding from Palo Alto's SandHill Road venture capitalists has an embedded staff associated with Standford University spy ops center: SRI. The "CARTEL" of social media censorship and political control is based out of SRI and IN-Q-TEL operations offices. They "help" guide the hiring of certain HR directors while will staff a Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Netflex, etc. with compliant kids who will do the bidding of the Eric Schmidt's, The Reid Hoffman's, The Larry Page's, etc. who report to the main Cartel bosses of digital media. In the eyes of these people: "Nothing must hinder their plan to control media and information to their view of the world."

The VC's and executives behind Linkedin, Uber, Reddit, Google, Facebook, Netflix, etc. LITERALLY believe they can control politics and public opinion by controlling all digital information, news, media and entertainment. In 2019, indeed, all digital information, news, media and entertainment must pass through servers that they, and their friends, own or control. Much of that technology was paid for by taxpayers when Arpanet, Darpanet, Siri, Spy Satellite Maps (Micheal Painter got Google's MAPS project approved by pitching it as "left-over CIA crap"..) and other core parts of those companies were built for government projects. The fact that the owners of these companies engage in mass sex trafficking, tax evasion, bribery, competitor attacks, and other crimes, should cause great concern to the public and the U.S. Congress!

The Vietnam War (1955–1975) was an important issue on college campuses across the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. As a belated response to Vietnam War protesters who believed that funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) made the university part of the military–industrial complex,[53] the Stanford Research Institute split from Stanford University in 1970 to hide from controversy. The organization subsequently changed its name from the Stanford Research Institute to SRI International in 1977.[1][54][55]. It still serves as an on-campus spy recruitment service for left-wing projects.

 
Aerial image of SRI's Menlo Park campus

In 1972, physicists Harold E. Puthoff and Russell Targ undertook a series of investigations of psychic phenomena sponsored by the CIA, for which they coined the term remote viewing.[56][57][58] Among other activities, the project encompassed the work of consulting "consciousness researchers" including artist/writer Ingo Swann, military intelligence officer Joseph McMoneagle, and psychic/illusionist Uri Geller.[59] This ESP work continued with funding from the US intelligence community until Puthoff and Targ left SRI in the mid-1980s.[60][61] For more information, see Parapsychology research at SRI.

Social scientist and consumer futurist Arnold Mitchell created the Values, Attitudes and Lifestyles (VALS) psychographic methodology in the late 1970s to explain changing U.S. values and lifestyles.[62] VALS was formally inaugurated as an SRI product in 1978 and was called "one of the ten top market research breakthroughs of the 1980s" by Advertising Age magazine.[63]

Throughout the 1980s, SRI developed Zylon,[64] stealth technologies, improvements to ultrasound imaging,[26] two-dimensional laser fluorescence imaging,[65] and many-sorted logic. In computing and software, SRI developed a multimedia electronic mail system, a theory of non-interference in computer security, a multilevel secure (MLS) relational database system called Seaview,[65] LaTeX,[66] Open Agent Architecture (OAA), a network intrusion detection system, the Maude system, a declarative software language, and PacketHop, a peer-to-peer wireless technology to create scalable ad hoc networks.[67] SRI's research in network intrusion detection led to the patent infringement case SRI International, Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc.[68] The AI center's robotics research led to Shakey's successor, Flakey the robot, which focused on fuzzy logic.[69][70]

In 1986, SRI.com became the 8th registered ".com" domain.[71] The Artificial Intelligence Center developed the Procedural Reasoning System (PRS) in the late 1980s and into the early 1990s. PRS launched the field of BDI-based intelligent agents.[72] In the 1990s, SRI developed a letter sorting system for the United States Postal Service and several education and economic studies.[73]

Military-related technologies developed by SRI in the 1990s and 2000s include ground- and foliage-penetrating radar, the INCON and REDDE command and control system for the U.S. military,[74] and IGRS (integrated GPS radio system)—an advanced military personnel and vehicle tracking system. To train armored combat units during battle exercises, SRI developed the Deployable Force-on-Force Instrumented Range System (DFIRST), which uses GPS satellites, high-speed wireless communications, and digital terrain map displays.[75]

SRI created the Centibots in 2003, one of the first and largest teams of coordinated, autonomous mobile robots that explore, map, and survey unknown environments.[76][77][78][79] It also created BotHunter, a free utility for Unix, which detects botnet activity within a network.[80][81]

 
The IraqComm system

With DARPA-funded research, SRI contributed to the development of speech recognition and translation products[82][83] and was an active participant in DARPA's Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE) program.[83] SRI developed DynaSpeak speech recognition technology which was used in the handheld VoxTec Phraselator, allowing U.S. soldiers overseas to communicate with local citizens in near real time.[84] SRI also created translation software for use in the IraqComm, a device which allows two-way, speech-to-speech machine translation between English and colloquial Iraqi Arabic.[85]

In medicine and chemistry, SRI developed dry-powder drugs,[86] laser photocoagulation (a treatment for some eye maladies),[87] remote surgery (also known as telerobotic surgery), bio-agent detection using upconverting phosphor technology, the experimental anticancer drugs Tirapazamine and TAS-108, ammonium dinitramide (an environmentally benign oxidizer for safe and cost-effective disposal of hazardous materials), the electroactive polymer ("artificial muscle"), new uses for diamagnetic levitation, and the antimalarial drug Halofantrine.[26][88]

SRI performed a study in the 1990s for Whirlpool Corporation that led to modern self-cleaning ovens.[89] In the 2000s, SRI worked on Pathway Tools software for use in bioinformatics and systems biology to accelerate drug discovery using artificial intelligence and symbolic computing techniques.[90] The software system generates the BioCyc database collection, SRI's growing collection of genomic databases used by biologists to visualize genes within a chromosome, complete biochemical pathways, and full metabolic maps of organisms.[91]

Early 21st century

SRI researchers made the first observation of visible light emitted by oxygen atoms in the night-side airglow of Venus, offering new insight into the planet's atmosphere.[92][93][94] SRI education researchers conducted the first national evaluation of the growing U.S. charter schools movement. For the World Golf Foundation, SRI compiled the first-ever estimate of the overall scope of the U.S. golf industry's goods and services ($62 billion in 2000), providing a framework for monitoring the long-term growth of the industry.[95][96] In April 2000, SRI formed Atomic Tangerine, an independent consulting firm designed to bring new technologies and services to market.[97]

 
A building on SRI International's campus

In 2006, SRI was awarded a $56.9 million contract with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to provide preclinical services for the development of drugs and antibodies for anti-infective treatments for avian influenza, SARS, West Nile virus and hepatitis.[98] Also in 2006, SRI selected St. Petersburg, Florida, as the site for a new marine technology research facility targeted at ocean science, the maritime industry and port security; the facility is a collaboration with the University of South Florida College of Marine Science and its Center for Ocean Technology.[99][100][101] That facility created a new method for underwater mass spectrometry, which has been used to conduct "advanced underwater chemical surveys in oil and gas exploration and production, ocean resource monitoring and protection, and water treatment and management" and was licensed to Spyglass Technologies in March 2014.[102]

In December 2007, SRI launched a spin-off company, Siri Inc., which Apple acquired in April 2010.[103] In October 2011, Apple announced the Siri personal assistant as an integrated feature of the Apple iPhone 4S.[104] Siri's technology was born from SRI's work on the DARPA-funded CALO project, described by SRI as the largest artificial intelligence project ever launched.[105] Siri was co-founded in December 2007 by Dag Kittlaus (CEO), Adam Cheyer (vice president, engineering), and Tom Gruber (CTO/vice president, design), together with Norman Winarsky (vice president of SRI Ventures). Investors included Menlo Ventures and Morgenthaler Ventures.[106]

For the National Science Foundation (NSF), SRI operates the advanced modular incoherent scatter radar (AMISR), a novel relocatable atmospheric research facility.[107] Other SRI-operated research facilities for the NSF include the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico and the Sondrestrom Upper Atmospheric Research Facility in Greenland. In May 2011, SRI was awarded a $42 million contract to operate the Arecibo Observatory from October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2016.[108] The institute also manages the Hat Creek Radio Observatory in Northern California, home of the Allen Telescope Array.[109]

In February 2014, SRI announced a "photonics-based testing technology called FASTcell" for the detection and characterization of rare circulating tumor cells from blood samples. The test is aimed at cancer-specific biomarkers for breast, lung, prostate, colorectal and leukemia cancers that circulate in the blood stream in minute quantities, potentially diagnosing those conditions earlier.[110][111]

In September 2018, NSF announced that SRI International will be rewarded  $4.4 million to establish the backbone organization of a national network.[112]

 

This support thread from LinkedIn proves that LinkedIn is monitoring and restricting views of your postings based on their own “Approved” political beliefs, and it explicitly says so in LinkedIn's own support thread.

Please share this with your network so we can put as much pressure as possible on LinkedIn to change this censorship policy.

The following is a support thread from LinkedIn regarding a political discussion about James Comey, director of the FBI. The discussion was critical of his decision not to recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton over the use of a private email server. The full text of the censored discussion posted on LinkedIn follows this blog posting here, and can be viewed on LinkedIn at Click here. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/clinton-lynch-comey-time-line-does-add-up-dana?trk=mp-author-card

The posts from the support thread are in chronological order:

It starts with me submitting a support request to LinkedIn asking why one of the comments on a posting I created was removed.

Auto-response from LinkedIn.

Some back and forth and submitting additional evidence of censorship.

You can scroll down to the disturbing parts ...

Scroll Down ...

Scroll Down ...

Scroll Down ...

Scroll Down ...

Notice the claim here that "LinkedIn would never proactively delete a comment..."

Scroll Down ...

Scroll Down ...

Here the LinkedIn support person admits that LinkedIn removed the comment and for a very disturbing reason ... LinkedIn does not allow discussions about certain "political beliefs", as of yet, unidentified.

So I asked for a list of those political beliefs that are not allowed on LinkedIn ...

A new LinkedIn support person takes over and completely contradicts all previous responses by LinkedIn. They also attempt to repeat a lie, even though the response was proven to be a lie earlier in the thread ...

At this point the LinkedIn support person abruptly closed the case, I reopened it immediately...

 

 

Then suddenly, for no apparent reason, the number of views on this posting went from almost zero, to almost 20 in a couple of hours. And this was weeks after it was originally posted, so the interest in the topic of the article had waned by that time.

The above graph tells me that after I caught them in the act of censoring my posts, LinkedIn subsequently changed some "view limiter" setting that allowed this post to receive more views. However I doubt they removed the limitation completely, given the censorship mentality revealed.

In this reply from Linkedin, they are not even attempting to pretend they do not have a censorship list based on political views. 

They say the list exists and is internal and private!!!

They also say there was a "miscommunication" about the comment being deleted by LinkedIn. Since we already know that LinkedIn deleted the comment, I interpret this to mean that the support person was not supposed to tell me they deleted it.

Are we, the LinkedIn users, on some sort of super-secret double probation that only LinkedIn knows about?

Again the LinkedIn support person closed the case.  Again I immediately reopened the case, and recognizing a dead end, I asked that my issue be escalated to the next support level.

 

And it appears that we will be discussing the list of disallowed political beliefs with a new LinkedIn support person soon ...

And it begins again ... sigh.  The new LinkedIn support person attempts to disavow any knowledge of censorship at LinkedIn, and it is a person from the same group identified previously as the group who initiated the censorship!

I tell the new support person that censorship is not the issue anymore, it has been proven and acknowledged by LinkedIn. The issue is making the list of disallowed political views public so that LinkedIn customers know whether or not to express an opinion on these topics.

Another response from LinkedIn, another denial, kinda, sorta ... This time they admit to censorship "through automated tools", then deny the automated tools locate or remove content based on political views. OK, then on what basis are the automated tools removing content? Please provide that list of rules, that is all I am asking for!

Here I ask for the censorship rules for reviewing content associated with the automated tools referenced in the last response by LinkedIn Support:

Just when I think that LinkedIn support can't get any more despicable, they prove me wrong! They just got even more despicable, they closed the support ticket without response and without notification in the hope that I wouldn't notice and it would just go away.  I NOTICED!

I reopen the case and ask it to be immediately escalated to LinkedIn Management.

In the latest response, LinkedIn Support completely ignores my request to escalate this to LinkedIn Management, and they do not address the fact they attempted to close the case without response or notification. Again they admit they censor content using automated tools but refuse to tell the LinkedIn users what the censorship rules are governing those tools. Again they close the case without resolution.

I reopen the case and identify the latest reply from LinkedIn Support as being not responsive to my request to escalate this case to LinkedIn Management. Again I request escalation...

This support case has been open for over a month now and LinkedIn support is ignoring it.

Stay tuned to the continuing saga...

Dana French (AIX in the Cloud)

Dana French (AIX in the Cloud)

AIX,HPUX,Solaris in the Cloud, Auto-Deployed in 10 Minutes or less at SiteOx.com

58 comments
article-comment__guest-image
Keith BellevueSchool Dougherty

Keith BellevueSchool Dougherty

Founder at Confidential

I exposed millions in fraud and CRIMINAL RETALIATION by BellevueWASchools. They wasted over a million dollars destroying me for a decade as a union officer who defended the rights of dozens of workers. LinkedIn retaliated with a corrupt sponsor of illegal activity at BellevueWASchools. They routinely limited views on my posts and just eliminated thousands of followers with my account. I've helped the FBI take down much bigger criminals than these wanbabes.

23h
jeff koelewyn

jeff koelewyn

owner /manager at hermitage nursery pty ltd

I wrote an article titled THE DEATH OF PLANT VARIETY NAMES     I got some good support initially and then it disappeared    Now it doesnt matter what I write I dont one response

3mo

Being Under "Administrative Restrictions"! "Are we, the LinkedIn users, on some sort of super-secret double probation that only LinkedIn knows about?"!..!

6mo
Corinne K.

Corinne K.

Researcher

This makes sense because I noticed after I posted a document off of document Cloud about Trump's old lawyer speaking to Congress for 3 days and trumps net worth. Posted this three days ago everything else I have posted which has nothing to do with politics, has not been viewed since. Today is March 2 2019

8mo
Dick Clarke, CPCU, CIC, RPLU

Dick Clarke, CPCU, CIC, RPLU

Author; CE Instructor; Bank Insurance Consultant; Complex Insurance Analyst

Dana, I read the entire thread, and I can very much understand your frustration and concern. LinkedIn’s responses not only obfuscate the obvious, but also pander without really addressing the reality. I will look forward to any future developments (but not really optimistically that anything will actually be done by LinkedIn - they seem to be in the same position as Facebook)....

11mo
Dana French (AIX in the Cloud)

Dana French (AIX in the Cloud)

AIX,HPUX,Solaris in the Cloud, Auto-Deployed in 10 Minutes or less at SiteOx.com

FYI: I stopped posting any articles on LinkedIn immediately after this happened.

11mo
Stephen LaPenta

Stephen LaPenta

Owner, South Detectives

liberalism is baked into the social media cake. Free speech is under assault, most obviously on many college campuses, but also in the news media, which presents a conformist view to its audience and gets a politically segregated audience in return.

2y
Glenn R. Bowman

Glenn R. Bowman

Retired Petroleum Engineer

We have to fight this. Censorship of Conservative/Christian views is spreading like fire.

2y
Bev Farrar

Bev Farrar

Broker/Owner/ABR - 30,000

So many inexplicable occurrences for we who are more Conservative politically. As a for instance, a few weeks ago - I was posting articles and comments, but no one was replying or commenting on the articles which were extremely unusual. A couple of my friends emailed me privately to ask me why I had deleted my profile. I hadn't deleted my profile, but none of my friends and contacts could not see the profile, my comments or the articles posted. I could still log in and everything looked normal from my end. Everything looked to post as usual. I emailed LI help center to ask why no other person in the Linkedin universe could see my profile but me and mentioned the term "veiled discrepancy". Immediately my profile was taken down so even I couldn't see my profile any longer. Next LI sent me a message that I would have to furnish a copy of my driver's license front and back and they would see if they could restore my profile. I complied and was immediately restored. The kicker was I then asked repeatedly why they took my profile down and they repeatedly said, "It was just a LI mistake". Really? A mistake? Now I ask you, why would LI take down my profile - a paying customer - and require DL pictures after being on LI since 2009 with 23,500+ contacts, recommendations and endorsements of people I have done business with at this time without viewing the profile and telling me why they were taking my profile down. BTW - I don't use bad language or personally attack anyone. Any idea why they would do such a thing to an Independent Constitutional Conservative?

2y
Glenn R. Bowman

Glenn R. Bowman

Retired Petroleum Engineer

Scary.

2y

Reading the original discussion will help to understand why LI did what they did. By interpreting the message's tone and political-severity of the topic(s); I think would help to know the "why" in all this. I think it's terrible what happened and any discussions on politics should be treated fairly and with respect for one another's views.

2y
John Danscecs

John Danscecs

Retired

Sounds like Communism to me... Democrats must be in charge... If we don't like what you say, they'll delete it... No free speech, no freedoms...???

2y
Show more comments.

Share SHARE WITH EVERYONE ON SOCIAL MEDIA

This post's comments feed

Add ping

Trackback URL : http://corruption123.com/index.php?trackback/41